|
|
Digital Library of the
European Council for Modelling and Simulation |
|
Title: |
A Simulation Of Disagreement For Control Of Rational Cheating In Peer
Review |
|
Authors: |
Francisco Grimaldo,
Mario Paolucci |
|
Published in:
|
(2012).ECMS
2012 Proceedings edited by: K. G. Troitzsch, M. Moehring, U. Lotzmann. European
Council for Modeling and Simulation. doi:10.7148/2012 ISBN:
978-0-9564944-4-3 26th
European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Shaping reality through simulation Koblenz,
Germany, May 29 – June 1 2012 |
|
Citation
format: |
Grimaldo, F., & Paolucci,
M. (2012). A Simulation Of Disagreement For Control Of Rational Cheating In
Peer Review. ECMS 2012 Proceedings edited by: K. G. Troitzsch,
M. Moehring, U. Lotzmann (pp. 676-682). European Council for
Modeling and Simulation. doi:10.7148/2012-0676-0682 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7148/2012-0676-0682 |
|
Abstract: |
We
present an agent-based model of peer review built on three entities - the
paper, the scientist and the confer- ence. The systems is implemented on a BDI platform (Jason) that
allows us to define a rich model of scoring, evaluating and selecting papers
for conferences. Some of the reviewers apply a strategy (called “rational
cheat- ing”) aimed to prevent papers better than
their own to be accepted. We show how a programme
committee update based on disagreement control can remove them. |
|
Full
text: |
|
