|
Digital Library of the
European Council for Modelling and Simulation |
Title: |
Investigation
Of Cognitive Neighborhoodsize By Agent-Based
Simulation |
Authors: |
Jens Steinhoefel, Frauke
Anders, Dominik Kalisch,
Hermann Koehler, Reinhard Koenig |
Published in: |
(2012).ECMS
2012 Proceedings edited by: K. G. Troitzsch, M. Moehring, U. Lotzmann. European
Council for Modeling and Simulation. doi:10.7148/2012 ISBN:
978-0-9564944-4-3 26th
European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Shaping reality through simulation Koblenz,
Germany, May 29 – June 1 2012 |
Citation
format: |
Steinhoefel, J., Anders, F., Kalisch, D., Koehler, H., & Koenig, R. (2012).
Investigation Of Cognitive Neighborhoodsize By
Agent-Based Simulation. ECMS 2012 Proceedings edited by: K. G. Troitzsch, M. Moehring, U. Lotzmann (pp. 669-675).
European Council for Modeling and Simulation. doi:10.7148/2012-0669-0675 |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7148/2012-0669-0675 |
Abstract: |
Different
social groups tend to settle in different parts of cities leading over time
to social segregation. Neighborhood obviously plays an important role in this
process – and what constitutes neighborhood is a cognitive notion. In
segregation analysis neighborhood borders are often drawn arbitrarily or
simple assumptions are used to weight neighbor influences. Some authors have
developed ideas to overcome such approaches by more detailed models. In this
work we investigate the size of a cognitive neighborhood on the base of a
continuous, geographically unlimited definition of neighborhood, using a
distance-dependent function as such neighborhood “size” definition. We use
agent-based simulation of the choice of residence as our primary
investigation tool. Tobler’s first law of geography
tells us that close things are more related than far ones. Extrapolating this
thought and applying it to the question discussed here one could expect that
closer neighbors have – on their own and in sum – more influence than those
living further apart. The “sum” in the last sentence would lead to a
neighborhood weighting of less than the inverse square of distance. The
results of this investigation confirm that this is the case. |
Full
text: |